Best Known (58, 58+36, s)-Nets in Base 25
(58, 58+36, 334)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 94, 334)-net over F25, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 95, 334)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 21, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (9, 27, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- digital (10, 47, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (9, 21, 104)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(58, 58+36, 3310)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (58, 94, 3310)-net over F25, using
(58, 58+36, 6284511)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 94, 6284512)-net in base 25, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 25m ≥ 254894 763587 268893 625438 047879 670399 884532 669159 430885 338946 718786 259758 667764 335588 328013 915434 419463 511536 937965 167185 089253 594625 > 2594 [i]