Best Known (53−51, 53, s)-Nets in Base 25
(53−51, 53, 28)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (2, 53, 28)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 27)-sequence over F25, using
(53−51, 53, 46)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (2, 53, 46)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 45)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 46, using
(53−51, 53, 77)-Net over F25 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (2, 53, 78)-net over F25, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (2, 52, 78)-net over F25, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2552, 78, F25, 50) (dual of [78, 26, 51]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(252, 27, S25, 2), but
- bound for OAs with strength k = 2 [i]
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 649 > 252 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(252, 27, S25, 2), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2552, 78, F25, 50) (dual of [78, 26, 51]-code), but
(53−51, 53, 186)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (2, 53, 187)-net in base 25, because
- 8 times m-reduction [i] would yield (2, 45, 187)-net in base 25, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2545, 187, S25, 43), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 111 488601 007381 568900 361473 791104 508011 644280 696117 448314 907960 593700 408935 546875 / 137824 248946 330259 > 2545 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2545, 187, S25, 43), but