Best Known (46, 59, s)-Nets in Base 25
(46, 59, 65170)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 59, 65170)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 10, 66)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (36, 49, 65104)-net over F25, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2549, 65104, F25, 13, 13) (dual of [(65104, 13), 846303, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2549, 390625, F25, 13) (dual of [390625, 390576, 14]-code), using
- an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 390624 = 254−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2549, 390625, F25, 13) (dual of [390625, 390576, 14]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2549, 65104, F25, 13, 13) (dual of [(65104, 13), 846303, 14]-NRT-code), using
- digital (4, 10, 66)-net over F25, using
(46, 59, 1645723)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (46, 59, 1645723)-net over F25, using
(46, 59, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 59, large)-net in base 25, because
- 11 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 48, large)-net in base 25, but