Best Known (43−14, 43, s)-Nets in Base 256
(43−14, 43, 1198371)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 43, 1198371)-net over F256, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 43, 1198371)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25643, 1198371, F256, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975522, 16]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25643, 8388598, F256, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388555, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25643, large, F256, 15) (dual of [large, large−43, 16]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 2563−1, defining interval I = [0,14], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25643, large, F256, 15) (dual of [large, large−43, 16]-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25643, 8388598, F256, 15) (dual of [8388598, 8388555, 16]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25643, 1198371, F256, 15, 15) (dual of [(1198371, 15), 17975522, 16]-NRT-code), using
(43−14, 43, 5567506)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (29, 43, 5567506)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(25643, 5567506, F256, 14) (dual of [5567506, 5567463, 15]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25643, large, F256, 14) (dual of [large, large−43, 15]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(25643, large, F256, 15) (dual of [large, large−43, 16]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 2563−1, defining interval I = [0,14], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(25643, large, F256, 15) (dual of [large, large−43, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25643, large, F256, 14) (dual of [large, large−43, 15]-code), using
(43−14, 43, large)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 43, large)-net in base 256, because
- 12 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 31, large)-net in base 256, but