Best Known (62−27, 62, s)-Nets in Base 256
(62−27, 62, 5043)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 62, 5043)-net over F256, using
- 2562 times duplication [i] based on digital (33, 60, 5043)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25660, 5043, F256, 27, 27) (dual of [(5043, 27), 136101, 28]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 13-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25660, 65560, F256, 27) (dual of [65560, 65500, 28]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,13]) ⊂ C([0,9]) [i] based on
- linear OA(25653, 65537, F256, 27) (dual of [65537, 65484, 28]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 2564−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−13,−12,…,13}|+1 = 28 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(25637, 65537, F256, 19) (dual of [65537, 65500, 20]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 2564−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−9,−8,…,9}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(2567, 23, F256, 7) (dual of [23, 16, 8]-code or 23-arc in PG(6,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2567, 256, F256, 7) (dual of [256, 249, 8]-code or 256-arc in PG(6,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(249,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2567, 256, F256, 7) (dual of [256, 249, 8]-code or 256-arc in PG(6,256)), using
- construction X applied to C([0,13]) ⊂ C([0,9]) [i] based on
- OOA 13-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25660, 65560, F256, 27) (dual of [65560, 65500, 28]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25660, 5043, F256, 27, 27) (dual of [(5043, 27), 136101, 28]-NRT-code), using
(62−27, 62, 32783)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (35, 62, 32783)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25662, 32783, F256, 2, 27) (dual of [(32783, 2), 65504, 28]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(25662, 65566, F256, 27) (dual of [65566, 65504, 28]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,13]) ⊂ C([0,8]) [i] based on
- linear OA(25653, 65537, F256, 27) (dual of [65537, 65484, 28]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 2564−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−13,−12,…,13}|+1 = 28 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(25633, 65537, F256, 17) (dual of [65537, 65504, 18]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 2564−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1 = 18 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(2569, 29, F256, 9) (dual of [29, 20, 10]-code or 29-arc in PG(8,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2569, 256, F256, 9) (dual of [256, 247, 10]-code or 256-arc in PG(8,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(247,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2569, 256, F256, 9) (dual of [256, 247, 10]-code or 256-arc in PG(8,256)), using
- construction X applied to C([0,13]) ⊂ C([0,8]) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(25662, 65566, F256, 27) (dual of [65566, 65504, 28]-code), using
(62−27, 62, large)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 62, large)-net in base 256, because
- 25 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 37, large)-net in base 256, but