Best Known (65−29, 65, s)-Nets in Base 256
(65−29, 65, 4682)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 65, 4682)-net over F256, using
- 2564 times duplication [i] based on digital (32, 61, 4682)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25661, 4682, F256, 29, 29) (dual of [(4682, 29), 135717, 30]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 14-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25661, 65549, F256, 29) (dual of [65549, 65488, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25661, 65550, F256, 29) (dual of [65550, 65489, 30]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(23) [i] based on
- linear OA(25657, 65536, F256, 29) (dual of [65536, 65479, 30]-code), using an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- linear OA(25647, 65536, F256, 24) (dual of [65536, 65489, 25]-code), using an extension Ce(23) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,23], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(2564, 14, F256, 4) (dual of [14, 10, 5]-code or 14-arc in PG(3,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2564, 256, F256, 4) (dual of [256, 252, 5]-code or 256-arc in PG(3,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(252,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2564, 256, F256, 4) (dual of [256, 252, 5]-code or 256-arc in PG(3,256)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(23) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25661, 65550, F256, 29) (dual of [65550, 65489, 30]-code), using
- OOA 14-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25661, 65549, F256, 29) (dual of [65549, 65488, 30]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25661, 4682, F256, 29, 29) (dual of [(4682, 29), 135717, 30]-NRT-code), using
(65−29, 65, 28309)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (36, 65, 28309)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25665, 28309, F256, 2, 29) (dual of [(28309, 2), 56553, 30]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(25665, 32781, F256, 2, 29) (dual of [(32781, 2), 65497, 30]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(25665, 65562, F256, 29) (dual of [65562, 65497, 30]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(19) [i] based on
- linear OA(25657, 65536, F256, 29) (dual of [65536, 65479, 30]-code), using an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- linear OA(25639, 65536, F256, 20) (dual of [65536, 65497, 21]-code), using an extension Ce(19) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,19], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 20 [i]
- linear OA(2568, 26, F256, 8) (dual of [26, 18, 9]-code or 26-arc in PG(7,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2568, 256, F256, 8) (dual of [256, 248, 9]-code or 256-arc in PG(7,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(248,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2568, 256, F256, 8) (dual of [256, 248, 9]-code or 256-arc in PG(7,256)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(19) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(25665, 65562, F256, 29) (dual of [65562, 65497, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(25665, 32781, F256, 2, 29) (dual of [(32781, 2), 65497, 30]-NRT-code), using
(65−29, 65, large)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 65, large)-net in base 256, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 38, large)-net in base 256, but