Best Known (65−38, 65, s)-Nets in Base 256
(65−38, 65, 522)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 65, 522)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 23, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (4, 42, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (4, 23, 261)-net over F256, using
(65−38, 65, 1047)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (27, 65, 1047)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(25665, 1047, F256, 38) (dual of [1047, 982, 39]-code), using
- 18 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 17 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(25663, 1027, F256, 38) (dual of [1027, 964, 39]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,985P) ⊂ AG(F,987P) [i] based on
- linear OA(25662, 1024, F256, 38) (dual of [1024, 962, 39]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,985P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- K1,2 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- linear OA(25660, 1024, F256, 36) (dual of [1024, 964, 37]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,987P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025 (see above)
- linear OA(2561, 3, F256, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2561, s, F256, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(25662, 1024, F256, 38) (dual of [1024, 962, 39]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,985P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- construction X applied to AG(F,985P) ⊂ AG(F,987P) [i] based on
- 18 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 17 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(25663, 1027, F256, 38) (dual of [1027, 964, 39]-code), using
(65−38, 65, 5387536)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 65, 5387537)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 3 432398 910977 995301 586719 095926 877623 941355 809654 210158 185090 447063 399513 505156 677271 403592 509098 466828 293694 366853 852580 309328 145230 314712 350011 930592 297216 > 25665 [i]