Best Known (6, 16, s)-Nets in Base 256
(6, 16, 515)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (6, 16, 515)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 5, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 11, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (0, 5, 257)-net over F256, using
(6, 16, 546)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (6, 16, 546)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25616, 546, F256, 2, 10) (dual of [(546, 2), 1076, 11]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(2565, 257, F256, 2, 5) (dual of [(257, 2), 509, 6]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;509,256) [i]
- linear OOA(25611, 289, F256, 2, 10) (dual of [(289, 2), 567, 11]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,567P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(2565, 257, F256, 2, 5) (dual of [(257, 2), 509, 6]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(6, 16, 519591)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (6, 16, 519592)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 340 283095 752478 887489 893638 475947 348051 > 25616 [i]