Best Known (8, 23, s)-Nets in Base 256
(8, 23, 515)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (8, 23, 515)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 7, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 16, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (0, 7, 257)-net over F256, using
(8, 23, 546)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (8, 23, 546)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25623, 546, F256, 4, 15) (dual of [(546, 4), 2161, 16]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(2567, 257, F256, 4, 7) (dual of [(257, 4), 1021, 8]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;1021,256) [i]
- linear OOA(25616, 289, F256, 4, 15) (dual of [(289, 4), 1140, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(4;F,1140P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(2567, 257, F256, 4, 7) (dual of [(257, 4), 1021, 8]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(8, 23, 491054)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (8, 23, 491055)-net in base 256, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (8, 22, 491055)-net in base 256, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 95781 234726 781699 535783 557009 304090 492585 440165 829176 > 25622 [i]