Best Known (26, 42, s)-Nets in Base 256
(26, 42, 8452)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 42, 8452)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 11, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (15, 31, 8192)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25631, 8192, F256, 16, 16) (dual of [(8192, 16), 131041, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(25631, 65536, F256, 16) (dual of [65536, 65505, 17]-code), using
- an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(25631, 65536, F256, 16) (dual of [65536, 65505, 17]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25631, 8192, F256, 16, 16) (dual of [(8192, 16), 131041, 17]-NRT-code), using
- digital (3, 11, 260)-net over F256, using
(26, 42, 139419)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (26, 42, 139419)-net over F256, using
(26, 42, large)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 42, large)-net in base 256, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 28, large)-net in base 256, but