Best Known (17, 43, s)-Nets in Base 256
(17, 43, 518)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 43, 518)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 15, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (2, 28, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (2, 15, 259)-net over F256, using
(17, 43, 642)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (17, 43, 642)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25643, 642, F256, 2, 26) (dual of [(642, 2), 1241, 27]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(25615, 321, F256, 2, 13) (dual of [(321, 2), 627, 14]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,628P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- linear OOA(25628, 321, F256, 2, 26) (dual of [(321, 2), 614, 27]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,615P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321 (see above)
- linear OOA(25615, 321, F256, 2, 13) (dual of [(321, 2), 627, 14]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(17, 43, 2053910)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 43, 2053911)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 35 836016 932798 992869 423908 186922 614412 082465 846048 950616 810486 519332 078279 738126 514499 656449 835571 476916 > 25643 [i]