Best Known (29, 53, s)-Nets in Base 256
(29, 53, 5463)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 53, 5463)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25653, 5463, F256, 24, 24) (dual of [(5463, 24), 131059, 25]-NRT-code), using
- OA 12-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(25653, 65556, F256, 24) (dual of [65556, 65503, 25]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(23) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- linear OA(25647, 65536, F256, 24) (dual of [65536, 65489, 25]-code), using an extension Ce(23) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,23], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(25633, 65536, F256, 17) (dual of [65536, 65503, 18]-code), using an extension Ce(16) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(2566, 20, F256, 6) (dual of [20, 14, 7]-code or 20-arc in PG(5,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2566, 256, F256, 6) (dual of [256, 250, 7]-code or 256-arc in PG(5,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(250,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2566, 256, F256, 6) (dual of [256, 250, 7]-code or 256-arc in PG(5,256)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(23) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- OA 12-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(25653, 65556, F256, 24) (dual of [65556, 65503, 25]-code), using
(29, 53, 24008)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (29, 53, 24008)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25653, 24008, F256, 2, 24) (dual of [(24008, 2), 47963, 25]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(25653, 32778, F256, 2, 24) (dual of [(32778, 2), 65503, 25]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(25653, 65556, F256, 24) (dual of [65556, 65503, 25]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(23) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- linear OA(25647, 65536, F256, 24) (dual of [65536, 65489, 25]-code), using an extension Ce(23) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,23], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 24 [i]
- linear OA(25633, 65536, F256, 17) (dual of [65536, 65503, 18]-code), using an extension Ce(16) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65535 = 2562−1, defining interval I = [1,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- linear OA(2566, 20, F256, 6) (dual of [20, 14, 7]-code or 20-arc in PG(5,256)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2566, 256, F256, 6) (dual of [256, 250, 7]-code or 256-arc in PG(5,256)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(250,256) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2566, 256, F256, 6) (dual of [256, 250, 7]-code or 256-arc in PG(5,256)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(23) ⊂ Ce(16) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(25653, 65556, F256, 24) (dual of [65556, 65503, 25]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(25653, 32778, F256, 2, 24) (dual of [(32778, 2), 65503, 25]-NRT-code), using
(29, 53, large)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 53, large)-net in base 256, because
- 22 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 31, large)-net in base 256, but