Best Known (20, 56, s)-Nets in Base 256
(20, 56, 516)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 56, 516)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 19, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 37, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (1, 19, 258)-net over F256, using
(20, 56, 578)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (20, 56, 578)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25656, 578, F256, 6, 36) (dual of [(578, 6), 3412, 37]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(25619, 289, F256, 6, 18) (dual of [(289, 6), 1715, 19]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(6;F,1715P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(25637, 289, F256, 6, 36) (dual of [(289, 6), 1697, 37]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(6;F,1697P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289 (see above)
- linear OOA(25619, 289, F256, 6, 18) (dual of [(289, 6), 1715, 19]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(20, 56, 920212)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 56, 920213)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 726 851335 713705 030310 337904 544332 801337 616812 746014 897709 017382 419601 874687 088374 827730 026935 120369 874825 153021 872453 706291 387323 983246 > 25656 [i]