Best Known (24, 63, s)-Nets in Base 256
(24, 63, 519)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 63, 519)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (3, 42, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (2, 21, 259)-net over F256, using
(24, 63, 1025)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (24, 63, 1025)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 1024)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- K1,2 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
(24, 63, 2244609)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 63, 2244610)-net in base 256, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 62, 2244610)-net in base 256, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 204587 521681 241019 335750 084231 256801 580690 036810 689401 965524 502805 381283 988140 951654 099967 398227 231447 486496 513286 605078 997462 117959 162581 866111 000576 > 25662 [i]