Best Known (25, 66, s)-Nets in Base 256
(25, 66, 519)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 66, 519)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 22, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (3, 44, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (2, 22, 259)-net over F256, using
(25, 66, 1025)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (25, 66, 1025)-net over F256, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 66, 1025)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 1024)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- K1,2 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 1024)-sequence over F256, using
(25, 66, 2185465)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 66, 2185466)-net in base 256, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (25, 65, 2185466)-net in base 256, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 3 432402 016664 059866 491954 191195 141322 486062 507414 057266 918995 901003 906271 846653 512727 518176 449856 050607 847729 491135 784244 773924 770716 645359 054162 260213 780726 > 25665 [i]