Best Known (61−13, 61, s)-Nets in Base 27
(61−13, 61, 1398100)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 61, 1398100)-net over F27, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2761, 1398100, F27, 13, 13) (dual of [(1398100, 13), 18175239, 14]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2761, 8388601, F27, 13) (dual of [8388601, 8388540, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2761, large, F27, 13) (dual of [large, large−61, 14]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348908 | 2710−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1 = 14 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2761, large, F27, 13) (dual of [large, large−61, 14]-code), using
- OOA 6-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2761, 8388601, F27, 13) (dual of [8388601, 8388540, 14]-code), using
(61−13, 61, large)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (48, 61, large)-net over F27, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(2761, large, F27, 13) (dual of [large, large−61, 14]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348908 | 2710−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1 = 14 (BCH-bound) [i]
(61−13, 61, large)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 61, large)-net in base 27, because
- 11 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 50, large)-net in base 27, but