Best Known (52, 52+14, s)-Nets in Base 27
(52, 52+14, 1198371)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 66, 1198371)-net over F27, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2766, 1198371, F27, 14, 14) (dual of [(1198371, 14), 16777128, 15]-NRT-code), using
- OA 7-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2766, 8388597, F27, 14) (dual of [8388597, 8388531, 15]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2766, large, F27, 14) (dual of [large, large−66, 15]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 275−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2766, large, F27, 14) (dual of [large, large−66, 15]-code), using
- OA 7-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2766, 8388597, F27, 14) (dual of [8388597, 8388531, 15]-code), using
(52, 52+14, large)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (52, 66, large)-net over F27, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(2766, large, F27, 14) (dual of [large, large−66, 15]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 275−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
(52, 52+14, large)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 66, large)-net in base 27, because
- 12 times m-reduction [i] would yield (52, 54, large)-net in base 27, but