Best Known (81−17, 81, s)-Nets in Base 27
(81−17, 81, 1048575)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 81, 1048575)-net over F27, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2781, 1048575, F27, 17, 17) (dual of [(1048575, 17), 17825694, 18]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2781, 8388601, F27, 17) (dual of [8388601, 8388520, 18]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2781, large, F27, 17) (dual of [large, large−81, 18]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348908 | 2710−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1 = 18 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2781, large, F27, 17) (dual of [large, large−81, 18]-code), using
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2781, 8388601, F27, 17) (dual of [8388601, 8388520, 18]-code), using
(81−17, 81, large)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (64, 81, large)-net over F27, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(2781, large, F27, 17) (dual of [large, large−81, 18]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348908 | 2710−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1 = 18 (BCH-bound) [i]
(81−17, 81, large)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 81, large)-net in base 27, because
- 15 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 66, large)-net in base 27, but