Best Known (1, 1+34, s)-Nets in Base 27
(1, 1+34, 38)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (1, 35, 38)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 37)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
(1, 1+34, 80)-Net over F27 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (1, 35, 81)-net over F27, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (1, 28, 81)-net over F27, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2728, 81, F27, 27) (dual of [81, 53, 28]-code), but
- dual of a near-MDS code is again a near-MDS code [i] would yield linear OA(2753, 81, F27, 52) (dual of [81, 28, 53]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(2753, 56, F27, 52) (dual of [56, 3, 53]-code), but
- dual of a near-MDS code is again a near-MDS code [i] would yield linear OA(2753, 81, F27, 52) (dual of [81, 28, 53]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2728, 81, F27, 27) (dual of [81, 53, 28]-code), but
(1, 1+34, 114)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (1, 35, 115)-net in base 27, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2735, 115, S27, 34), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 3 740918 756607 856715 449925 720055 608804 414244 957088 936599 / 29566 > 2735 [i]