Best Known (57−41, 57, s)-Nets in Base 27
(57−41, 57, 96)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 57, 96)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 57, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
(57−41, 57, 100)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(16, 57, 100)-net in base 27, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 60, 100)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 45, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 45, 100)-net over F81, using
(57−41, 57, 144)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (16, 57, 144)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 143)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
(57−41, 57, 3241)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 57, 3242)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (16, 56, 3242)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 143 566224 058144 136388 653452 876557 974471 803711 156690 958638 334043 514537 939679 972937 > 2756 [i]