Best Known (89−44, 89, s)-Nets in Base 27
(89−44, 89, 192)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 89, 192)-net over F27, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (45, 91, 192)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 34, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (11, 57, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (11, 34, 96)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(89−44, 89, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(45, 89, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 89, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 19 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- 19 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
(89−44, 89, 615)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (45, 89, 615)-net over F27, using
(89−44, 89, 214967)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 89, 214968)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 24 624945 934368 795597 119367 275344 625381 063923 483156 183167 886314 340977 127981 190816 406680 312231 433778 774511 704486 427536 459121 475921 > 2789 [i]