Best Known (90−47, 90, s)-Nets in Base 27
(90−47, 90, 188)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 90, 188)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 33, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (10, 57, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (10, 33, 94)-net over F27, using
(90−47, 90, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(43, 90, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
(90−47, 90, 440)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (43, 90, 440)-net over F27, using
(90−47, 90, 125371)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 90, 125372)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 89, 125372)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 24 629303 801036 784158 529946 195252 209391 280207 046412 485878 766113 254332 911506 351960 347897 547963 598929 908101 393099 334157 717599 552945 > 2789 [i]