MinT - Best Known (28, 28+59, s)-Nets in Base 27

Best Known (28, 28+59, s)-Nets in Base 27

(28, 28+59, 114)-Net over F₂₇ — Constructive and digital

Digital (28, 87, 114)-net over F₂₇, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 87, 114)-net over F₂₇, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F₂₇, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
    - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(28, 28+59, 160)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive

(28, 87, 160)-net in base 27, using

5 times m-reduction [i] based on (28, 92, 160)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 69, 160)-net over F₈₁, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F₈₁, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(28, 28+59, 208)-Net over F₂₇ — Digital

Digital (28, 87, 208)-net over F₂₇, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 87, 208)-net over F₂₇, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F₂₇, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
    - an algebraic function field by Beelen and Pellikaan [i]

(28, 28+59, 7871)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s

There is no (28, 87, 7872)-net in base 27, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 86, 7872)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27^mÂ â‰¥ 1254 023118 063653 397543 789186 539724 067278 444139 471985 054429 371891 606020 754026 613234 341349 172562 316771 028196 734032 072451 353473 > 27⁸⁶ [i]