MinT - Best Known (26, 26+61, s)-Nets in Base 27

Best Known (26, 26+61, s)-Nets in Base 27

(26, 26+61, 114)-Net over F₂₇ — Constructive and digital

Digital (26, 87, 114)-net over F₂₇, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 87, 114)-net over F₂₇, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F₂₇, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
    - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(26, 26+61, 150)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive

(26, 87, 150)-net in base 27, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on (26, 88, 150)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (4, 66, 150)-net over F₈₁, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F₈₁, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(26, 26+61, 208)-Net over F₂₇ — Digital

Digital (26, 87, 208)-net over F₂₇, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 87, 208)-net over F₂₇, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F₂₇, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
    - an algebraic function field by Beelen and Pellikaan [i]

(26, 26+61, 5860)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s

There is no (26, 87, 5861)-net in base 27, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 86, 5861)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27^mÂ â‰¥ 1257 253903 471995 831345 101468 345934 001650 567341 398881 662332 607955 314319 650508 102558 963476 408531 803253 522392 534396 220364 600849 > 27⁸⁶ [i]