MinT - Best Known (32, 32+65, s)-Nets in Base 27

Best Known (32, 32+65, s)-Nets in Base 27

(32, 32+65, 114)-Net over F₂₇ — Constructive and digital

Digital (32, 97, 114)-net over F₂₇, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 97, 114)-net over F₂₇, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F₂₇, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
    - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(32, 32+65, 172)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive

(32, 97, 172)-net in base 27, using

3 times m-reduction [i] based on (32, 100, 172)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 75, 172)-net over F₈₁, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F₈₁, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(32, 32+65, 208)-Net over F₂₇ — Digital

Digital (32, 97, 208)-net over F₂₇, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 97, 208)-net over F₂₇, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F₂₇, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
    - an algebraic function field by Beelen and Pellikaan [i]

(32, 32+65, 9666)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s

There is no (32, 97, 9667)-net in base 27, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 96, 9667)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27^mÂ â‰¥ 258423 941926 936877 466297 964928 427212 807067 072357 429462 350122 579626 088964 389475 420220 159941 566679 440063 036531 072655 570756 605410 284249 610945 > 27⁹⁶ [i]