Best Known (29, 29+71, s)-Nets in Base 27
(29, 29+71, 114)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 100, 114)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 100, 114)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
(29, 29+71, 150)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(29, 100, 150)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (4, 75, 150)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
(29, 29+71, 208)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (29, 100, 208)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 100, 208)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
(29, 29+71, 5965)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 100, 5966)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 99, 5966)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 5074 433285 867348 950823 474832 620419 920440 394504 989828 064062 662955 378428 926060 298017 108204 500022 943706 735568 252209 897433 597868 325244 680141 232465 > 2799 [i]