MinT - Best Known (63, 100, s)-Nets in Base 27

Best Known (63, 100, s)-Nets in Base 27

(63, 100, 304)-Net over F₂₇ — Constructive and digital

Digital (63, 100, 304)-net over F₂₇, using

generalized (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (6, 15, 76)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F₂₇, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
2. digital (6, 18, 76)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F₂₇ (see above)
3. digital (6, 24, 76)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F₂₇ (see above)
4. digital (6, 43, 76)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F₂₇ (see above)

(63, 100, 730)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive

(63, 100, 730)-net in base 27, using

8 times m-reduction [i] based on (63, 108, 730)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (36, 81, 730)-net over F₈₁, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 729)-sequence over F₈₁, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 730, using
      - the Hermitian function field over F₈₁ [i]

(63, 100, 5215)-Net over F₂₇ — Digital

Digital (63, 100, 5215)-net over F₂₇, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(63, 100, large)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s

There is no (63, 100, large)-net in base 27, because

35 times m-reduction [i] would yield (63, 65, large)-net in base 27, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]