Best Known (50, 102, s)-Nets in Base 27
(50, 102, 192)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 102, 192)-net over F27, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (50, 106, 192)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 39, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (11, 67, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (11, 39, 96)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(50, 102, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(50, 102, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 102, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
(50, 102, 562)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (50, 102, 562)-net over F27, using
(50, 102, 167353)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 102, 167354)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 99 801566 685360 503516 745600 884739 478727 599428 904572 016918 872808 114110 900813 613725 664139 385752 333229 906660 844143 159530 222081 826535 702419 837819 374805 > 27102 [i]