Best Known (32, 104, s)-Nets in Base 27
(32, 104, 114)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 104, 114)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 104, 114)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
(32, 104, 160)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(32, 104, 160)-net in base 27, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (32, 108, 160)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 81, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 81, 160)-net over F81, using
(32, 104, 208)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (32, 104, 208)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 104, 208)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
(32, 104, 7476)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 104, 7477)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 72795 999705 418344 709085 716987 669067 112400 579331 099761 282049 845270 301627 031210 279690 388570 241233 045700 493320 133250 756375 417202 361539 299217 666636 067057 > 27104 [i]