Best Known (14, 49, s)-Nets in Base 27
(14, 49, 96)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (14, 49, 96)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 49, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
(14, 49, 100)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(14, 49, 100)-net in base 27, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (14, 52, 100)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 39, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 39, 100)-net over F81, using
(14, 49, 136)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (14, 49, 136)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (13, 49, 136)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 135)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 135)-sequence over F27, using
(14, 49, 3028)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (14, 49, 3029)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (14, 48, 3029)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 508 879861 725619 703919 134175 238541 175154 289274 107329 911595 838471 396067 > 2748 [i]