Best Known (40, 56, s)-Nets in Base 27
(40, 56, 2508)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 56, 2508)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 10, 48)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 47)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 47)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (30, 46, 2460)-net over F27, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2746, 2460, F27, 16, 16) (dual of [(2460, 16), 39314, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2746, 19680, F27, 16) (dual of [19680, 19634, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2746, 19683, F27, 16) (dual of [19683, 19637, 17]-code), using
- an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 19682 = 273−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2746, 19683, F27, 16) (dual of [19683, 19637, 17]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2746, 19680, F27, 16) (dual of [19680, 19634, 17]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2746, 2460, F27, 16, 16) (dual of [(2460, 16), 39314, 17]-NRT-code), using
- digital (2, 10, 48)-net over F27, using
(40, 56, 54527)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (40, 56, 54527)-net over F27, using
(40, 56, large)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 56, large)-net in base 27, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 42, large)-net in base 27, but