Best Known (26, 90, s)-Nets in Base 27
(26, 90, 114)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 90, 114)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 90, 114)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
(26, 90, 116)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(26, 90, 116)-net in base 27, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (26, 96, 116)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 72, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 72, 116)-net over F81, using
(26, 90, 208)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (26, 90, 208)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 90, 208)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
(26, 90, 5202)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 90, 5203)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 666 320008 779158 239710 842539 712280 462026 671534 591441 553011 369387 456570 493395 064235 423653 573084 036681 346709 996027 271809 896770 043585 > 2790 [i]