Best Known (28, 90, s)-Nets in Base 27
(28, 90, 114)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 90, 114)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 90, 114)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
(28, 90, 160)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(28, 90, 160)-net in base 27, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (28, 92, 160)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 69, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 69, 160)-net over F81, using
(28, 90, 208)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (28, 90, 208)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 90, 208)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
(28, 90, 6817)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 90, 6818)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 667 479906 123264 739711 348567 602604 732605 625745 295404 769579 335042 490707 662856 495527 265801 946912 761520 006124 289167 185501 204073 419945 > 2790 [i]