Best Known (46, 95, s)-Nets in Base 27
(46, 95, 192)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 95, 192)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 35, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (11, 60, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (11, 35, 96)-net over F27, using
(46, 95, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(46, 95, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 95, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
(46, 95, 495)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (46, 95, 495)-net over F27, using
(46, 95, 152239)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 95, 152240)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 94, 152240)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 353 342420 508744 351255 482971 452655 885683 120523 101448 203295 455229 586464 973003 886422 639642 029172 507165 912792 623201 470482 388416 213963 783169 > 2794 [i]