Best Known (200−101, 200, s)-Nets in Base 3
(200−101, 200, 69)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 200, 69)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (99, 201, 69)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 72, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 129, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 72, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(200−101, 200, 97)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (99, 200, 97)-net over F3, using
(200−101, 200, 723)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 200, 724)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 199, 724)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 90266 713998 185768 064678 469443 986935 681499 545212 540450 912158 761779 432157 127035 262843 504234 703897 > 3199 [i]