MinT - Best Known (202−103, 202, s)-Nets in Base 3

Best Known (202−103, 202, s)-Nets in Base 3

(202−103, 202, 69)-Net over F₃ — Constructive and digital

Digital (99, 202, 69)-net over F₃, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (21, 72, 32)-net over F₃, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F₃, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
2. digital (27, 130, 37)-net over F₃, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F₃, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₃ with g(F)Â =Â 26, N(F)Â =Â 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(202−103, 202, 96)-Net over F₃ — Digital

Digital (99, 202, 96)-net over F₃, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 202, 96)-net over F₃, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F₃, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
    - algebraic function fields over â„¤₃ by Niederreiter/Xing [i]

(202−103, 202, 704)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s

There is no (99, 202, 705)-net in base 3, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 201, 705)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3^mÂ â‰¥ 816454 688301 018918 540057 370732 599139 162595 473891 337930 661426 139908 940986 033494 512929 514926 227547 > 3²⁰¹ [i]