Best Known (125, 125+103, s)-Nets in Base 3
(125, 125+103, 85)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (125, 228, 85)-net over F3, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (125, 231, 85)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 80, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 151, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 80, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(125, 125+103, 149)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (125, 228, 149)-net over F3, using
(125, 125+103, 1270)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (125, 228, 1271)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (125, 227, 1271)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 104192 322714 891408 292739 821255 092008 929079 586804 901632 182942 643405 603532 698839 452871 268716 279961 587826 690427 > 3227 [i]