Best Known (126, 126+103, s)-Nets in Base 3
(126, 126+103, 85)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 229, 85)-net over F3, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 234, 85)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 81, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 153, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 81, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(126, 126+103, 152)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (126, 229, 152)-net over F3, using
(126, 126+103, 1298)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 229, 1299)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 228, 1299)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6 137835 202670 462709 306553 994536 058715 336117 421317 215125 759971 531518 242866 765945 174117 318358 884057 137455 209099 > 3228 [i]