Best Known (92, 92+103, s)-Nets in Base 3
(92, 92+103, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 195, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 195, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(92, 92+103, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (92, 195, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 195, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(92, 92+103, 599)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 195, 600)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (92, 194, 600)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 383 636966 567854 765364 598865 699880 483653 406830 479166 951718 694683 806734 286955 245129 225111 859937 > 3194 [i]