Best Known (202−104, 202, s)-Nets in Base 3
(202−104, 202, 65)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (98, 202, 65)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (98, 64)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 64)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 64)-sequence over F9, using
(202−104, 202, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (98, 202, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 202, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(202−104, 202, 671)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (98, 202, 672)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 464114 937200 784719 369115 941619 576587 996996 111788 426819 961360 065637 084092 430970 219071 204162 630401 > 3202 [i]