Best Known (195−105, 195, s)-Nets in Base 3
(195−105, 195, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 195, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 195, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(195−105, 195, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (90, 195, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 195, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(195−105, 195, 559)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 195, 560)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 194, 560)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 376 204170 274236 817320 194351 235482 687618 464333 702566 630507 250660 609281 327392 835874 970354 531457 > 3194 [i]