Best Known (129, 129+106, s)-Nets in Base 3
(129, 129+106, 85)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (129, 235, 85)-net over F3, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (129, 243, 85)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 84, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 159, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 84, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(129, 129+106, 154)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (129, 235, 154)-net over F3, using
(129, 129+106, 1292)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (129, 235, 1293)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 13809 579046 561751 373417 539229 434068 491438 257860 462699 740985 822363 535694 951124 906535 340156 275559 216125 100929 258091 > 3235 [i]