Best Known (207−107, 207, s)-Nets in Base 3
(207−107, 207, 68)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (100, 207, 68)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 74, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (26, 133, 36)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 35)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 74, 32)-net over F3, using
(207−107, 207, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (100, 207, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 207, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(207−107, 207, 685)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (100, 207, 686)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (100, 206, 686)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 199 261602 837566 674175 589136 653903 627439 054493 366219 204139 204894 927190 736909 760789 015283 771910 176149 > 3206 [i]