MinT - Best Known (101, 101+107, s)-Nets in Base 3

Best Known (101, 101+107, s)-Nets in Base 3

(101, 101+107, 69)-Net over F₃ — Constructive and digital

Digital (101, 208, 69)-net over F₃, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (21, 74, 32)-net over F₃, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F₃, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
2. digital (27, 134, 37)-net over F₃, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F₃, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₃ with g(F)Â =Â 26, N(F)Â =Â 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(101, 101+107, 96)-Net over F₃ — Digital

Digital (101, 208, 96)-net over F₃, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 208, 96)-net over F₃, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F₃, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
    - algebraic function fields over â„¤₃ by Niederreiter/Xing [i]

(101, 101+107, 701)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s

There is no (101, 208, 702)-net in base 3, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 207, 702)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3^mÂ â‰¥ 623 334707 854432 713212 586654 540528 716429 232203 599394 501934 823653 376817 871067 160694 804201 226848 989237 > 3²⁰⁷ [i]