Best Known (204−109, 204, s)-Nets in Base 3
(204−109, 204, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 204, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 204, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(204−109, 204, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (95, 204, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 204, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(204−109, 204, 600)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 204, 601)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 203, 601)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 7 738434 827879 333275 726633 997933 095617 875216 112474 226084 934228 155512 241667 958013 645317 038575 483401 > 3203 [i]