MinT - Best Known (96, 96+109, s)-Nets in Base 3

Best Known (96, 96+109, s)-Nets in Base 3

(96, 96+109, 65)-Net over F₃ — Constructive and digital

Digital (96, 205, 65)-net over F₃, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (15, 69, 28)-net over F₃, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F₃, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
2. digital (27, 136, 37)-net over F₃, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F₃, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₃ with g(F)Â =Â 26, N(F)Â =Â 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(96, 96+109, 96)-Net over F₃ — Digital

Digital (96, 205, 96)-net over F₃, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 205, 96)-net over F₃, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F₃, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₃ with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
    - algebraic function fields over â„¤₃ by Niederreiter/Xing [i]

(96, 96+109, 613)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s

There is no (96, 205, 614)-net in base 3, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 204, 614)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3^mÂ â‰¥ 22 505064 439786 449005 196650 786107 527390 461865 244640 841846 953643 279013 261899 656786 543546 517699 112053 > 3²⁰⁴ [i]