Best Known (210−111, 210, s)-Nets in Base 3
(210−111, 210, 66)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 210, 66)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (99, 65)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 65)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 65)-sequence over F9, using
(210−111, 210, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (99, 210, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 210, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(210−111, 210, 640)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 210, 641)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 209, 641)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5253 824546 854634 730833 631465 946205 408084 412472 610020 207017 448768 541123 026527 343726 101602 463591 637451 > 3209 [i]