Best Known (210−115, 210, s)-Nets in Base 3
(210−115, 210, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 210, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 210, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(210−115, 210, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (95, 210, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 210, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(210−115, 210, 565)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 210, 566)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 209, 566)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5439 325295 713906 562721 792576 474767 461625 383513 417005 473026 593092 719630 421250 468686 201655 403526 527357 > 3209 [i]