Best Known (248−116, 248, s)-Nets in Base 3
(248−116, 248, 85)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (132, 248, 85)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (131, 248, 85)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (131, 249, 85)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (27, 86, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 163, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 86, 37)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (131, 249, 85)-net over F3, using
(248−116, 248, 146)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (132, 248, 146)-net over F3, using
(248−116, 248, 1174)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (132, 248, 1175)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 21473 106325 175478 648730 502541 246842 317353 498643 768311 833239 809481 497185 794642 177643 335282 015076 158810 966473 165599 045181 > 3248 [i]