Best Known (96, 96+117, s)-Nets in Base 3
(96, 96+117, 64)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 213, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 213, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 96+117, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (96, 213, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 213, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(96, 96+117, 567)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 213, 568)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 212, 568)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 153062 857423 382572 279034 795002 736447 215256 573590 883893 017280 144013 249386 569245 610938 159230 928490 945873 > 3212 [i]